PAPIAS THE AUTHOR OF ORAL TRADITION.
                                                             A DISREPUTABLE WITNESS.


             Papias, AD. 0- 130  approximately, Bishop of Hierapolis in Asia and alleged by Eusebius to be the writer of five books titled
    “Expositions of Oracles of theLord,” made the claim that he wastaught by the apostles Andrew, Peter, Phillip, Thomas, James,
    John and Matthew plus two others who were not apostles,   Aristion and the elder John. To be certain this would make him a
    credible witness, if it were true and he himself was trustworthy but the content of his own writings testifies that he is a disreputable
    witness and casts doubt on everyone who acknowledges him, such as IRENAUS AND EUSEBIUS.  Irenaus attributes the
    following as HAVING BEEN SPOKEN BY THE LORD and delivered to Papias from the apostles.
1.

            “The days will come, in which vines shall grow, each having ten thousand shoots, and on each shoot ten thousand branches
        and on each branch again ten thousand twigs and on each twig ten thousand clusters, and on each cluster ten thousand grapes
        and each grape when pressed shall yield five and twenty measures of wine. And when any of the saints shall have taken hold
        of one of the clusters,another shall cry, I am a better cluster; take me, bless the Lord through me…”
2.

     Is that or anything like it, in the Bible? What do the Scriptures say,

          “God, who in sundry times and divers manners spake in times past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days  
           spoken to us by the Son...”
(Heb.1:1-2)

         This means that God has ceased speaking to man, since speaking by Jesus as recorded by His apostles. If Papias claimed to
    record the words of Jesus then he would be claiming to be an apostle. Now Anastasius of Sinai claimed Papias' sayings were
    interpreted spiritually, 3. nevertheless it is stated by Iraneus, that Papius claimed that Jesus said these words. If that was the
    case then they would be the words of God and hence Scripture. Aside from the somewhat ludicrous and carnal  nature of the
    words Jesus is alleged to have said,  and of which no parallel can be found amongst His words, they are extra Biblical and adding
    to the word of God.

     God says,
    “Do not add to His words, lest He  reprove you and you be found a liar.” (Pro.30.6) 

    Papias was a liar.

        Further damming evidence of his character  is found in his denial of the death of Judas and hence inerrancy of the Gospels in
   the following;


            “Judas walked about in this world a terrible exampleof impiety; his flesh swollen to such an extent that, where a wagon can
          pass with ease, he was not able to pass, no, not even the mass of his head merely. They say that his eyelids swelled to such
         an extent that he could not see the light at all, while as for his eyes they were not visible even by a physician looking through
         an instrument, so far had they sunk from the surface...”
4.

             The Scriptures expressly state that Judas hung himself, fell headlong and burst open in the middle and his entrails spilled
     out,therefore the field was called the field of blood.
(Acts 1. 18-19) That he died is certain for he went to his own place (Acts 1.25) which,
     since he was possessed by Satan was hell. Therefore Papias is directly contradicting Scripture and plainly speaking only to those
     who were ignorant of the Scriptures. He claimed to be taught by the apostles but speaks contrary to them. Papias was a liar.
  
           These sayings of Papias are among his few  remaining. It is a sad indictment against him if all that can be credited to him with
     certainty speaks only of his falsification of the Scriptures. It therefore must be made plain that any scholar who uses Papias as a
     source to justify a proposition is either terribly ignorant, terribly foolish or an outright deceiver. To use one such as Papias as a
     supporting source, invalidates one’s argument from the  beginning. Papias is the first foundation stone of the Synoptic Problem
     and Liberalism. Liberalism is simply unbelief in the Word of God.

                 1.    Lightfoot J.B. The Apostolic Fathers. pg.269.
                 2.    ibid pg.269
                 3.    ibid pg.269

























IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD... Jn.1:1
 
PAPIAS & TAITAN




















 
      TATIAN'S DIATESSARON OR  
          GOSPEL HARMONY

        Another man: the author of the first harmony, had a similar  
   reputation. Tatian 160- AD compiled a harmony, which had a great
   influence on the Church and its interpretation of Scripture. Yet
  Taitan was a Gnostic, a heretic, a liar, yet perversely the Church
  acts as though his compilation of a Gospel harmony was correct. Yet
  Taitan’s harmony, like all subsequent harmonies, has thousands of
  errors because of the way it is complied. It is forced and similar
  incidences are mistaken for identical incidences, so that the Gospels
  appear to have errors. Taitan is the second foundation stone of
  Liberalism.


He that is of God heareth God's words. Jn. 8:47
www.archdesign.neilcadman.com
HOME DESIGN










                  
                                                                        
   
        


                                                                                                              

                                                                            

COPYRIGHT  NEIL CADMAN B'Sc.(Arch.) B Arch. M.Rel.Ed.
ARE THERE ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?
               ARE THERE  ERRORS IN THE GOSPELS?
                         IS THERE LITERARY DEPENDENCY IN THE GOSPELS?
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
Website update  29:10:10
BACK
NEXT
CLIMATE CHANGE OR GOD'S JUDGEMENT
          See, www.freedom.neilcadman.com