THE GOSPELS ARE CHRONOLOGICALLY ORDERED.
Luke says, "“Insomuch as many have taken in hand to set out in order a declaration of those things that are most surely
believed among us...It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write to you
in order, most excellent Theophilus, that you might know the certainty of those things, of which you have been told.” Lk.1:1-4
Luke says that he wrote his gospel in order. Luke and the other writers were writing an account, a declaration of things that
have happened. i.e. a history. If a history is not chronologically ordered, it is not in order.
Luke says the other writers also wrote “in order.” They also must have wrote a declaration ordered in the same manner as
Luke's was to enable him to say that he "also" was writing an account "in order"
Many say that Luke did not write a chronologically ordered book but it was ordered in some other manner. Usually they say it
was theologically ordered. If this is the case it should be stated how it is theologically ordered, but no one has. It is pretty foolish
to say the book is theologically ordered and then not prove how it is theologically ordered. Moreover that must mean the other
Gospels are theologically ordered, for Luke says that they also wrote declarations in order. Are they theologically ordered in the
same manner as Luke or in a different manner?
EVIDENCE OF CHRONOLOGY
CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER .
ALWAYS CLICK ON
ICON FOR HOME
COPYRIGHT NEIL CADMAN B'Sc.(Arch.) B Arch. M.Rel.Ed.
ARE THERE ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?
ARE THERE ERRORS IN THE GOSPELS?
IS THERE LITERARY DEPENDENCY IN THE GOSPELS?
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
Website update 29:10:10
CLIMATE CHANGE OR GOD'S JUDGEMENT